|
American
Pit Bull Terrier History
( You will see the term APBT used, it stands for American Pit Bull
Terrier.)
Among enthusiasts,
the history of the APBT is as controversial as the breed itself
is among the misled public. The breed's history is a recurrent subject
of lively debate in the magazines devoted to the breed. In fact,
this FAQ was hotly debated among the contributors before it reached
its final form, and still everyone isn't 100% happy!
Although the
precise origin of the APBT is not known, we can reliably trace its
roots back at least one hundred and fifty years or so [1] to England.
During the late 18th and early 19th centuries the sport of bull-baiting
was very much alive and dogs were bred to excel in this endeavor.
The same type of dog was also used by hunters to catch game and
by butchers and farmers to bring down unruly cattle. These dogs
were called "bulldogs." Historically, the word "Bulldog"
did not mean a specific breed of dog per se, but rather it was applied
to descendants of the ancient Mastiff- type dogs that excelled in
the task of bull-baiting. The "bulldogs" of yore were
much different from, and should not be confused with, the loveable
clowns of the show ring today. The old, performance-bred, working
bulldog was closer in phenotype and spirit to the APBT and/or the
modern American Bulldog. The use of the word "bulldog"
applied to APBT's persists even today among APBT fanciers.
When bull-baiting
was outlawed in England in 1835 the sport of matching two dogs against
one another in combat rose in popularity to fill the void. One point
of contention about the history of the APBT is whether these pit
fighting dogs were essentially a new breed of dog specially created
for this popular pastime. Some authors, notably Richard Stratton,
have theorized that the APBT is essentially the same breed as the
Renaissiance bull-baiting dogs, largely unmixed with any other kind
of dog, specifically terriers. These authors consider the present
name, American Pit Bull Terrier, a double misnomer, since, in their
view, the breed is not of American origin and is not a terrier.
They explain
the popular attribution of the breed's origin to a cross between
bull-baiters and terriers as a retrospective confusion with the
breeding history of the English Bull Terrier, which is a totally
distinct breed that was never successful at pit fighting but whose
origin is well-documented. Other authors who have researched the
topic, such as Dr. Carl Semencic, argue that the APBT is indeed
the product of a cross between bull-baiting dogs and terriers and
that the breed simply did not exist in its current form during the
Renaissance. They would argue that when we think of the terriers
in the APBT's ancestry, we should not envision modern-day show dogs
like Yorkshire Terriers, but instead working terriers (probably
now extinct) that were bred for great tenacity in hunting. The problem
of proof, which hangs over the discussion of any early breed history,
is compounded in this case by the extreme secrecy of the breeders
of pit dogs. In the 19th century pedigrees, if committed to paper
at all, were not divulged, since every breeder feared letting his
rivals in on the secrets of his success and replicating it. In any
case, by no later than the mid-19th century, the breed had acquired
all of the essential characteristics for which it is still prized
today: its awesome athletic abilities, its peerless gameness, and
its easy-going temperament.
The immediate
ancestors of the APBT were Irish and English pit fighting dogs imported
to the States in the mid-19th century. Once in the United States,
the breed diverged slightly from what was being produced back in
England and Ireland. In America, where these dogs were used not
only as pit fighters, but also as catch dogs (i.e., for forcibly
retrieving stray hogs and cattle) and as guardians of family, the
breeders started producing a slightly larger, leggier dog. However,
this gain in size and weight was small until very recently. The
Old Family Dogs in 19th century Ireland were rarely above 25 lbs.,
and 15-lb. dogs were not uncommon. In American books on the breed
from the early part of this century, it is rare to find a specimen
over 50 lbs. (with a few notable exceptions). From 1900 to 1975
or so, there was probably a very small and gradual increment in
the average weight of APBTs over the years, without any corresponding
loss in performance abilities. But now that the vast majority of
APBTs are no longer performance-bred to the traditional pit standard
(understandably, since the traditional performance test, the pit
contest itself, is now a felony), the American axiom of "Bigger
is Better" has taken over in the breeding practices of the
many neophyte breeders who joined the bandwagon of the dog's popularity
in the 1980s. This has resulted in a ballooning of the average size
of APBTs in the last 15 years--a harmful phenomenon for the breed,
in our opinion. Another, less visible modification of the breed
since the 19th century was the selective intensification of genetically
programmed fighting styles (such as front-end specialists, stifle
specialists, etc.), as performance breeding became more sophisticated
under competitive pressures. In spite of these changes, there has
been a remarkable continuity in the breed for more than a century.
Photos from a century ago show dogs indistinguishable from the dogs
being bred today. Although, as in any performance breed, you will
find a certain lateral (synchronic) variability in phenotype across
different lines, you will nevertheless find uncanny chronological
continuity in these types across decades. There are photos of pit
dogs from the 1860s that are phenotypically (and, to judge by contemporary
descriptions of pit matches, constitutionally) identical to the
APBTs of today.
Throughout the
19th century, these dogs were known by a variety of names. "Pit
Terriers", "Pit Bull Terriers", "Half and Half's",
"Staffordshire Fighting Dogs", "Old Family Dogs"(
the Irish name), "Yankee Terriers" (the Northern name),
and "Rebel Terriers" (the Southern name) to name a few.
In 1898, a man by the name of Chauncy Bennet formed the United Kennel
Club (UKC) for the sole purpose of registering "Pit Bull Terriers"
as the American Kennel Club wanted nothing to do with them. Originally,
he added the word "American" to the name and dropped "Pit".
This didn't please all of the people so later the word "Pit"
was added back to the name in parentheses as a compromise. The parentheses
were then removed from the name about 15 years ago. All other breeds
that are registered with UKC were accepted into the UKC after the
APBT. Another registry of APBTs is the American Dog Breeders Association
(ADBA) which was started in September, 1909 by Guy McCord, a close
friend of John P. Colby. Now under the stewardship of the Greenwood
family, the ADBA continues to register only APBTs and is more in
tune with the APBT as a breed than the UKC. The ADBA does sponsor
conformations shows, but more importantly, it sponsors weight pulling
competitions which test a dogs strength, stamina, and heart. It
also publishes a quarterly magazine dedicated to the APBT called
the American Pit Bull Terrier Gazette (see the "References"
section). The authors feel that the ADBA is now the flagship registry
of APBT as it is doing more to preserve the original characteristics
of the breed.
In 1936, thanks
to "Pete the Pup" in the "Lil Rascals" and "Our
Gang" who familiarized a wider audience with the APBT, the
AKC jumped on the bandwagon and registered the breed as the "Staffordshire
Terrier". This name was changed to "American Staffordshire
Terrier" (AST) in 1972 to distinguish it from its smaller,
"froggier", English cousin the Staffordshire Bull Terrier.
In 1936, for all intents and purposes, the AKC, UKC, and ADBA version
of the "Pit Bull" were identical since the original AKC
stock came from pit fighting dogs, which were UKC and ADBA registered.
During this time period, and the years that preceded it, the APBT
was a well-liked dog in America. At this time the APBT was considered
an ideal family pet. Because of his fun-loving, forgiving temperament,
the breed was rightly considered an excellent dog for families with
small children. Even if most of them couldn't identify the breed
by name, kids of the Lil Rascals generation wanted a companion just
like "Pete the Pup". During the First World War, there
was an American propaganda poster that represented the rival European
nations with their national dogs dressed in military uniforms; and
in the center representing the United States was an APBT declaring
in a caption below: "I'm neutral, but not afraid of any of
them."
Since 1936,
due to different breeding goals, the American Staffordshire Terrier
and the American Pit Bull Terrier have diverged in both phenotype
and spirit/temperament, although both, ideally, continue to have
in common an easy-going, friendly disposition. [2] Some folks in
the fancy feel that after 60 years of breeding for different goals,
these two dogs are now entirely different breeds. Other people choose
to view them as two different strains of the same breed (working
and show). Either way, the gap continues to widen as breeders from
both sides of the fence consider it undesirable to interbreed the
two. To the untrained eye, ASTs may look more impressive and fearsome,
with a larger and more blocky head, with bulging jaw muscles, a
wider chest and thicker neck. In general, however, they aren't nearly
as "game" or athletic as game-bred APBTs. Because of the
standardization of their conformation for show purposes, ASTs tend
to look alike, to a much greater degree than APBTs do. APBTs have
a much wider phenotypical range, since the primary breeding goal,
until fairly recently, has been not to produce a dog with a certain
"look" but to produce one capable of winning pit contests,
in which the looks of a dog counted for nothing. There are some
game-bred APBTs that are practically indistinguishable from typical
ASTs, but in general they are leaner, leggier, and lighter on their
toes and have more stamina, agility, speed, and explosive power.
Following the
second World War, until the early 1980s, the APBT lapsed into relative
obscurity. But those devoted few who knew the breed knew it in intimate
detail. These devotees typically knew much more about their dogs'
ancestry than about their own--they were often able to recite pedigrees
back six or eight generations. When APBTs became popular with the
public around 1980, nefarious individuals with little or no knowledge
of the breed started to own and breed them and predictably, problems
started to crop up. Many of these newcomers did not adhere to the
traditional breeding goals of the old-time APBT breeders. In typical
backyard fashion they began randomly breeding dogs in order to mass
produce puppies as profitable commodities. Worse, some unscrupulous
neophytes started selecting dogs for exactly the opposite criteria
that had prevailed up to then: they began selectively breeding dogs
for the trait of human aggressiveness. Before long, individuals
who shouldn't have been allowed near a gold fish were owning and
producing poorly bred, human-aggressive "Pit Bulls" for
a mass market. This, coupled with the media's propensity for over-simplification
and sensationalization, gave rise to the anti-"Pit Bull"
hysteria that continues to this day. It should go without saying
that, especially with this breed, you should avoid backyard breeders.
Find a breeder with a national reputation; investigate, for example,
the breeders who advertise in the breed's flagship magazine, The
American Pit Bull Terrier Gazette. In spite of the introduction
of some bad breeding practices in the last 15 years or so, the vast
majority of APBTs remain very human-friendly.
The American
Canine Temperament Testing Association, which sponsors tests for
temperament titles for dogs, reported that 95% of all APBTs that
take the test pass, compared with a 77% passing rate for all breeds
on average. The APBT's passing rate was the fourth highest of all
the breeds tested.
|